Foreign and domestic experience with evaluating student’s success in universities and universities

Foreign and domestic experience with evaluating student’s success in universities and universities

The evaluation system in various countries has its own own peculiarities. For instance, in American advanced schooling institutions evaluation of students is carried call at credits. Each credit takes a one-hour (50 min.) lecture, a presentation at a seminar or involvement in a(3-hour that is laboratory-practical class. In addition, pupils must spend two hours on non-attendance training. Through the semester program (3 hours week that is per, 3 credits are credited for just two hours seminary classes, 3 credits for 2-3 hours laboratory lessons and one credit per semester.

Pupils simply take exams through the core procedures at the center and also at the end associated with the semester. Evaluate understanding of the letter system: A (“excellent”), B (“good”), C (“satisfactory”), B (“satisfactory with a minus”), E (“unsatisfactory”). In the event of “satisfactory by having a minus” the pupil is obliged to listen to the program again and also to pass the exam. The criterion of success can be an typical semester rating. Pupils regarded as a learning student who received 2 points and higher. The surname of this pupil who scored 3.5 points is entered into the honorary range of the dean’s workplace. A student who scored from 1.7 to 1.99 points gets a caution concerning the have to enhance performance, if he recovers this same rating or from 1.1 to 1.7, then gets a critical caution. If a student gets 1.1 points for the semester or has severe warnings and can not score a rating of 2, or when after warning gaining significantly less than 1.7 points, he could be taken faraway from the institution.

European connection with evaluating pupil’s success

In Germany, pupils’ understanding of degree organizations is examined on a 5-point system:

  • “very good” (1),
  • “good” (2),
  • “satisfactory” (3),
  • “enough” (4),
  • “not enough” (5).

Success can be defined in credits. One credit hour per semester ensures that the pupil must work within one week of 1 hour using this discipline. For a 4-year term, the pupil must make 150-160 credits.

Italian universities want in an operational system needless to say exams, that are accepted by commissions composed of three teachers, all of which could place no more than 10 points. The protection of written theses or even a draft in the front of the payment of 11 instructors is a final exam. The score that is total achieve 110 points.

The integration associated with higher education system to the European space that is educational the introduction of a credit-module system in degree organizations, a unique destination when you look at the system of evaluation associated with amount of professional training for the graduate, obliges each teacher to analyze the ability of international and domestic advanced schooling, artistically put it to use in their practical activity.

Rating system of student’s success evaluation

The score system of assessment of knowledge primarily activates the pupil’s independent work, makes it rhythmic and systematic during the semester; better educated and cognitive activity is motivated, the role of marketing autonomy, initiative, obligation, imagination in academic and cognitive activity increases; the objectivity associated with the assessment is increased, very nearly totally unrelated to your successful or unsuccessful reply to the score or exam; the emotional anxiety through the test decreases considerably. In addition, permits the teacher to individualize learning and a differentiated method of students, plays a part in the logical construction regarding the pupil through the semester, especially throughout the exam sessions.

Utilization of the rating system of assessment within the process that is educational the biased way of the evaluation of pupils’ knowledge; will act as a fruitful way of motivating academic and cognitive task; raises the student’s obligation for learning outcomes; promotes the utilization of the concept of individualization of training; removes the situation of going to classes; frees the student time for classes by passions; the character of cooperation prevails into the market, the instructor ceases to be a manager, and so forth.

Consequently, the instructor must be cautious and artistically to make use of the criteria and norms for evaluating the data, skills and abilities of students. It ought to be directed because of the systematic axioms of this methodology of academic work, attentively connect with each pupil, taking into consideration his inclinations, interests and aspirations, to exhibit principles that are high tact.

Previous post:

Next post: